Documents from Postal Regulatory Commission Chairwoman Ruth Y. Goldway To Senator Thomas Carper in response to his questions on her travel:
The Honorable Thomas R. Carper
Chairman
Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information,Federal Services and International Security
U.S. Senate
Washington D.C. 20510
Dear Chairman Carper,
Pursuant to your letter of February 8, 2012, please find attached a summary and related documents that are responsive to your questions regarding Commission travel. This information demonstrates that Commission travel is in support of statutory obligations, performed in a cost-efficient manner, and benefits the Commission, the Postal Service, and the mailing public.
Enclosed are:
1. A document describing and detailing my travel during my chairmanship, with references to attached itineraries and agendas
2. Itineraries and agendas during my chairmanship
3. A synopsis of the Commission’s travel policies, with supporting documents
4. A listing of former Chairman Blair’s and former Chairman Omas’ travel
5. A description and listing of the Commission’s field hearings since 2007, with supporting itineraries and agendas
Thank you for your acknowledgment of our expanded efforts to consult with you and your staff. I am pleased to submit this detailed information as part of our effort to continue that consultative relationship. I am available, as is my staff, if you have any questions or would like to discuss this information.
Ruth Y. Goldway
Chairman PRC
- PRC Chairwoman Ruth Goldway’s Letter and Summary to Sen. Carper (PDF)
- Sen. Carper’s Feb. 8, 2012 Letter regarding PRC Travels (PDF)
- PRC Travel Policy and Summary Documents (PDF)
- PRC Field Hearings Travel Report (PDF)
- Travel Reports of Former PRC Chairmen Dan Blair and Omas (PDF)
- PRC Travel Records Compiled (Large
.
Perform is a cost effective way is a real joke a better title would be “A COMEDY OF ERRORS” COSTLY ERRORS. Must be a conservative that does not want change just continue to preserve means of maintaining salary.
No justification to wasteful needless spending. No results from this expenditure.
The PRC serves no useful purpose to increase revenue or decrease debt.
PRC could be eliminated and for what it has contributed it has been nonexistent.
No justification to wasteful needless spending. No results from this expenditure.
The PRC serves no useful purpose to increase revenue or decrease debt.
PRC could be eliminated and for what it has gained it has been nonexistent.
The prc is just a wasteful redundant government cake job that just makes sure big business can have a say in the operations of the USPS. The fact that congress already overseas the USPS, as well as OIG, and the postal inspection service. The PRC should be eliminated.