<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PostalReporter News Blog &#187; EEOC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalreporternews.net/tag/eeoc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net</link>
	<description>Postal News, Postal Articles and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EEOC Update: Notice to Walker vs USPS Class Members</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2012/01/11/eeoc-update-notice-to-walker-vs-usps-class-members/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2012/01/11/eeoc-update-notice-to-walker-vs-usps-class-members/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmond C Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=9362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is being sent to you to correct mistakes made by the Postal Service in the last mailing to class members. It was the Agency&#8217;s responsibility to provide correct information and to include an Initial Inquiry Regarding Damages, which it failed to do. The failure was in no way due to error by the Commission [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2012/01/11/eeoc-update-notice-to-walker-vs-usps-class-members/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edmond Walker vs USPS EEO Class Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/11/29/edmond-walker-vs-usps-eeo-class-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/11/29/edmond-walker-vs-usps-eeo-class-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 04:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmond C Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=8949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This survey was sent via Priority Mail with Delivery Confirmation to about 26,000 potentially eligible postal employees nationwide. It&#8217;s due back December 15th. A little background on the case: Edmond Walker, a Temporary Rural Carrier Relief, filed a class complaint alleging that discriminatory acts had been continuing for a class of disabled permanent rehabilitation employees [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/11/29/edmond-walker-vs-usps-eeo-class-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEO Complaint Alleges Postal Police Officers Denied USPS Paid Benefit Offered To Postal Inspectors</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/09/11/eeo-complaint-alleges-postal-police-officers-denied-usps-paid-benefit-offered-to-postal-inspectors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/09/11/eeo-complaint-alleges-postal-police-officers-denied-usps-paid-benefit-offered-to-postal-inspectors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal inspectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal polic officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS Postal Inspectors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=7930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did USPS properly addressed a Postal Police Officer&#8217;s class claim allegation that she was discriminated against because the USPS does not offer self-referral counseling to its Postal Police Officers? In a complaint dated June 22, 2008, a Postal Police Officer (PPO) in USPS&#8217;s Los Angeles Post Office in Pasadena, California maintained that she was subjected [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/09/11/eeo-complaint-alleges-postal-police-officers-denied-usps-paid-benefit-offered-to-postal-inspectors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals Court Upholds Firing of Acting Postal Supervisor (204B) For Timecard Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/08/10/appeals-court-upholds-firing-of-acting-postal-supervisor-204b-for-timecard-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/08/10/appeals-court-upholds-firing-of-acting-postal-supervisor-204b-for-timecard-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Court Of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=7577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acting Postal Supervisor was terminated for falsifying timecard but not his female boss (Postmaster) Charles Wilcher, a 204B (acting) supervisor from the letter carrier craft, claimed he was “working” on July 5, 2006 when he spent the day with his Postmaster .  She was also accused of getting paid for July 5, 2006 even though [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/08/10/appeals-court-upholds-firing-of-acting-postal-supervisor-204b-for-timecard-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Adverse Ruling In EEOC Class Action NRP Case Could Have A &#8216;Material Impact&#8217; On USPS</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/08/08/an-adverse-ruling-in-eeoc-class-action-nrp-case-could-have-a-material-impact-on-usps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/08/08/an-adverse-ruling-in-eeoc-class-action-nrp-case-could-have-a-material-impact-on-usps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nrp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Reassessment Process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=7567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As PostalReporter.com noted earlier, USPS ended its National Reassessment Process (NRP) January 31, 2011. The statement by USPS below may be the reason it has quietly abandoned the program. On January 14, 2010, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission&#8217;s (EEOC) Office of Federal Operations certified a class action case against the Postal Service in a matter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/08/08/an-adverse-ruling-in-eeoc-class-action-nrp-case-could-have-a-material-impact-on-usps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPS Settles Class Action Discrimination Lawsuit Filed For Disabled Veterans</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/06/12/usps-settles-class-action-discrimination-lawsuit-filed-for-disabled-veterans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/06/12/usps-settles-class-action-discrimination-lawsuit-filed-for-disabled-veterans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Hill vs Donahoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabled veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rehabilitation Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=6877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Hill vs Potter : Clarence Hill filed a class complaint alleging that the Postal Service discriminated against him and all disabled veteran applicants by making improper pre-employment medical inquiries. On February 18, 2011, Judge Davi named Corey Baskerville, Zedrick Jenkins,and Frank Vander Haar as additional Class Agents. Clarence Hill has not agreed to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/06/12/usps-settles-class-action-discrimination-lawsuit-filed-for-disabled-veterans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Regulations On ADA Amendments Act of 2008 Broadens Definition Of Disability</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/04/10/new-regulations-on-ada-amendments-act-of-2008-broadens-definition-of-disability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/04/10/new-regulations-on-ada-amendments-act-of-2008-broadens-definition-of-disability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 05:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans with Disabilities Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Register]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=6013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 25, 2011, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued new regulations governing the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA). The regulations greatly broaden the definition of &#8220;disability&#8221; under the ADAAA, making clear that to &#8220;substantially&#8221; limit a major life activity, an impairment need not be &#8220;significantly&#8221; or &#8220;severely&#8221; limiting, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/04/10/new-regulations-on-ada-amendments-act-of-2008-broadens-definition-of-disability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postal Supervisor Loses Lawsuit on Hostile Work Environment</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/03/20/postal-supervisor-loses-lawsuit-on-hostile-work-environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/03/20/postal-supervisor-loses-lawsuit-on-hostile-work-environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[legal cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal supervisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=5561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Postal Supervisor Claimed A Hostile Work Environment aggravated his medical condition and USPS failed to investigate. The following facts are based upon the allegations in John Pell&#8217;s amended complaint filed in the United States District Court and information from the EEOC case. Pell is a former employee of the USPS who worked at the Framingham, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/03/20/postal-supervisor-loses-lawsuit-on-hostile-work-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class Action EEO Pending For USPS Improperly Requiring &#8220;Forensic Psychiatric Evaluations&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/02/22/class-action-eeo-pending-for-usps-improperly-requiring-forensic-psychiatric-evaluations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/02/22/class-action-eeo-pending-for-usps-improperly-requiring-forensic-psychiatric-evaluations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensic Psychiatric Evaluations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=5178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Postal Employees: &#8220;Were You Mandated to Submit to a  “Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation” Before USPS Allowed You Back To Work?&#8221; The EEOC has pending before it a Petition for Class Certification over the Postal Service’s: (1) refusal to properly train their medical unit and management personnel regarding obligations under the Rehabilitation Act; as instructed to do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/02/22/class-action-eeo-pending-for-usps-improperly-requiring-forensic-psychiatric-evaluations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postal Workers Class Action EEOC Cases Against USPS</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/02/18/postal-workers-class-action-eeoc-cases-against-usps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/02/18/postal-workers-class-action-eeoc-cases-against-usps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>postal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postal Workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postalreporternews.net/?p=5144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following are summaries of some class action EEOC cases pending and/or settled against USPS. John Cyncar vs USPS In the first class action case, complainant John Cyncar on April 30, 2001 filed a formal EEO complaint alleging that he was discriminated against in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2011/02/18/postal-workers-class-action-eeoc-cases-against-usps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

