House GOP rejects 2-month payroll tax cut

December 20, 2011 by
Filed under: Congress 

Temper Tantrum on Capitol Hill

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress lurched toward Grinch-like gridlock on Tuesday as the Republican-controlled House rejected a two-month extension of Social Security tax cuts that President Barack Obama said was “the only viable way” to prevent a drop in take-home pay for 160 million workers on Jan. 1.

“The clock is ticking, time is running out,” Obama said shortly after House voted 229-193 to request negotiations with the Senate on renewing the payroll tax cuts for a year.

House Speaker John Boehner, told that Obama had sought his help, replied, “I need the president to help out.” His voice rose as he said it, and his words were cheered by dozens of Republicans lawmakers who have pushed him and the rest of the leadership to pursue a more confrontational strategy with Democrats and the White House in an already contentious year of divided government.

This time, it wasn’t a partial government shutdown or even an unprecedented Treasury default that was at stake, but the prospect that payroll taxes would rise and long-term unemployment benefits end for millions of jobless victims of the worst recession since the 1930s.

Yet another deadline has been entangled in the dispute, this one affecting seniors, but the administration announced it had finessed a way around it. Officials said paperwork for doctors who treat Medicare patients in the early days of the new year will not be processed until Jan. 18, giving lawmakers more time to avert a 27 percent cut in fees threatened for Jan. 1.

Whatever the stakes, there was little indication that Republicans would get their wish for negotiations with the Senate any time soon. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., issued a statement saying he would be happy to resume talks on a yearlong measure — “but not before” the House ratifies the two-month bill and sends it to Obama for his signature.

Given Obama’s remarks and Reid’s refusal to negotiate, it was unclear what leverage Republicans had in the year-end standoff. It appeared likely the partisan disagreement could easily persist past Christmas and into the last week of the year.

The standoff was sowing confusion in business, running out of days to adapt to any new payroll tax regimen. Even the Senate’s proposed two-month extension was creating headaches because it contained a two-tiered system geared to ensuring that higher-income earners paid a higher rate on some of their wages, according to a trade group.

“There’s not time enough to do that in an orderly fashion,” said Pete A. Isberg, president of the National Payroll Reporting Consortium trade group. “We’re two weeks away from 2012.” He wrote a letter to congressional leaders this week warning that the Senate bill “could create substantial problems, confusion and costs.”

Democrats pounced on Republicans for rejecting the Senate bill, emboldened by polls finding Obama’s approval rising and that of the congressional Republicans fading. They noted that several lawmakers whom Boehner appointed to negotiate a compromise had recently criticized an extension of payroll tax cuts.

Democrats also introduced legislation in the House to ratify the two-month bill that passed the Senate.

read full story

AFL-CIO sent out this message yesterday:

I just got a message from our Government Affairs director, Bill Samuel, telling me about a temper tantrum on Capitol Hill.

It’s flat-out heartless for lawmakers to go home and enjoy the holidays, while their political posturing causes millions of families across America to suffer anxiety and heartbreak. But House Speaker John Boehner is threatening to do just that.

He says he’ll block unemployment aid and raise taxes on working families—even though 89 senators from both sides of the aisle already voted to extend the aid and keep the tax cut in place.

Failing to extend emergency unemployment aid and middle-class tax cuts is cruel and wrong. Cruel because it takes away a lifeline for families that need it. Wrong because it delivers two massive blows to our fragile economy.

I need you to stop what you’re doing, pick up the phone and dial 1-888-245-3381. Tell the person who answers the phone: “Please pass the Senate’s bill to extend unemployment aid and middle-class tax cuts immediately.”

You can also call House Speaker John Boehner at 202-225-0600. Tell him, “ You and your Tea Party supporters can’t keep hurting the American people just so you can get what you want. Stop this temper tantrum and pass the Senate’s bipartisan bill to extend unemployment aid and middle-class tax cuts now.”

If you want to learn more about the deal, keep reading. I’m forwarding a message from Bill. But the most important thing is for you to pick up the phone, right now.
From: Bill Samuel
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 10:40 AM
To: Richard L. Trumka
Subject: Temper Tantrum on Capitol Hill

Rich,

As I mentioned this weekend, the Senate passed a bipartisan deal with 89 votes to keep emergency unemployment benefits going for two months and extend middle-class tax cuts.

This was not just a bipartisan deal–it passed with an overwhelming super-majority.

This two-month extension seemed like a done deal. But this morning, we got word that John Boehner and his Tea Party friends are threatening to blow up the whole thing. The Senate has already left town. This is really bad.

The only thing that might be able to save emergency unemployment and middle-class tax cuts is a flood of phone calls from outraged constituents. Can you ask our activists to make emergency phone calls today?

The toll-free number we need people to call today is 1-888-245-3381. People should demand their representative pass the Senate’s bipartisan bill to extend unemployment aid and tax cuts for working families.

They can also call House Speaker John Boehner and tell him the same thing. His number is 202-225-0600.

A House vote is expected as early as 6:30 p.m. eastern time tonight, but people should keep calling in and spreading the word to friends and family in case the vote gets delayed.

I wish I had better news–but with activists’ help we might be able to make this come out OK.

– Bill

Comments

13 Comments on House GOP rejects 2-month payroll tax cut

  1. Tax the shit out of the rich! on Tue, 20th Dec 2011 9:22 pm
  2. Tax the shit out of the rich!!

    Tax the shit out of the rich!

    Tax the shit out of the rich!

  3. Get Real on Wed, 21st Dec 2011 4:28 am
  4. Boner is a Dick!

  5. POPS on Wed, 21st Dec 2011 11:10 am
  6. Like I I have said before anyone in the middle class voting Republican is a fool !!!!!

  7. annonymous on Wed, 21st Dec 2011 2:29 pm
  8. this is insane, opposition govt is supposed to keep power balanced! ..but what is going on is a “tennis match” ….i see both the sides just busy with themselves fighting… they are pushing USA to the extreme..if they keep fighting like this in all issues.. I guess they are going to doom any buisneess associated with them… I am talking about usps…. they are going to show their party anger in the next issue!.. guess who is that! they have no time for “common welfare…give the benifit of doubt to the ones who rule…. can we.. no no..no.. do we do what oppositon says…no..no…so what do we do?!

  9. annonymous on Wed, 21st Dec 2011 2:36 pm
  10. to me the most cruel thing is to increase the burden of debt!…number one.. to date… that comes infront of anything… considering, no indiscriminate cuts to any one class ( not including the super rich, they are actually enjoying increased benifits in this recession)..reps are saying debt control, dems seem to use the words -we are not indiscriminate cuts…..steer america in proper direction.. together…or else I say dont vote for any one.period

  11. Say What on Wed, 21st Dec 2011 2:49 pm
  12. You guys are so damn clueless and so beholden to the UNION propaganda machine, no wonder your asses is going to the meat grinder. WAKE UP.

    The house approved a 1 year extension as was Obow wows recommendation originally. The Senate passed only a 2 month extension.
    SO I guess because the UNION and other LIBERALS would rather give you 2 months, you think it is better than 12 months.

    Let me give you a hint; 12 months is a larger numbver than 2 months. 12-2=10 more months. It reminds me of the J Fallon commercial. Everybody likes more money, would you like more money, NO, because my UNION sad so. I do not have an opinion of my own. I pay the UNION THUGS $52 a month or more to make all my decisions. I ain’t too bright and that is why they call me DIMmy.

  13. Say Who on Thu, 22nd Dec 2011 12:18 am
  14. The only clueless moron here is you, f**knuts. Only dumbsh*t Flat Earth, Fake Newsers come on here with there anti-union, anti-middle class bullsh*t taken right off Rupert’s airwaves. You have all the slogans and labels memorized like the REAL BRAINDEAD TEABAG IDIOT you are.

  15. Skye Shepard on Thu, 22nd Dec 2011 6:06 am
  16. This tax cut thing is such a bunch of BS! It’s a smoke screen, can’t people see that? If this money is coming out of what would be the social security system, then we (collectively) are idiots if we think this is actually going to HELP the economy. Social Security is already freaking in trouble! I know people want to discount Michelle Bachman, but she actually does know what the hell she’s talking about in regards to the economy, the budget and the taxation systems! This is just a recipe for distaster, $40 a week at a time.

  17. Say What on Thu, 22nd Dec 2011 7:54 am
  18. You are the clueless horse that is being led to slaughter. You cannot argue with the fact that Boehner and the House agreed to and passed a 12, that is TWELVE MONTH and one more time for you pea brain THAT IS A FULL YEAR, which is 10 months more than 2 months. Harry Reid and his goons reduced it to 2 months. How can you argue with that? Basic math 12 is more than 2, even in the Union halls. It is not a tax reductions anyway. It is a reduction in social security deductions, which is already struggling. You can only hide behind the UNION for so laong. Eventually you must show your ugly head and face reality. Look around at all the UNIONs have destroyed. Would you rather have a job that paid well for life or a UNION job that paid well until the company went bankrupt. You are working for one of those companies right now. Keep denying it all you want to, but changes are in the mill and IT WILL HAPPEN, just a matter of time. People are not willing to pay someone to carry a letter up the street for $30 an hour, when they don’t have to MAIL that letter. They can email, text, phone call or drive and talk and deliver all their presents along the way. I just mailed a robe to a family member and the postage cost more than the robe.

  19. Meeting our Delivery Optimization goals on Thu, 22nd Dec 2011 12:20 pm
  20. “but changes are in the mill and IT WILL HAPPEN, just a matter of time.”

    I can see that…good thing it was just a robe you mailed Say what.. even if it did land in the sprinklers.

    Chump change employees might have a down side, they dont want to bust their butts over a low paying job…just a thought?

  21. Mack the Knife on Thu, 22nd Dec 2011 8:37 pm
  22. God, these Teabaggers are stupid.

  23. Wall*Nut on Fri, 23rd Dec 2011 3:53 pm
  24. Ain’t no stupid like Flat Earth Fake News stupid!

  25. Soon to be Retired on Sat, 24th Dec 2011 2:04 am
  26. Anyone in the middle class still voting for these Corporate Shill Rethuglikkkans, is a complete stupid f#$k.