Comments on: Court: Postal Worker’s Vulgar Language is Sufficient Grounds for Removal

By: dawn

dawn — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:43:57 +0000

Wow! after 21 yrs……..Everyone should b fired! LOL!

By: Dwight

Dwight — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:15:19 +0000

I am shocked that the steward did not go to arbitration? I am a steward and although the grievant had a colorful past, everything outside of the zero tolerence should have been mute. The steward should have went to arb and sought to get a LAST CHANCE AGREEMENT. Management has done the exact same things to employees over the years. Where was the steward comparables to prove that point?
I’m glad you will never have to represent me!

By: Postal moe

Postal moe — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:41:43 +0000

What a load of horse manure. I informed Potter in 2003 or 2004 about the profanityl\ laced language used by Mr. Gregory Incontro, Senior Plant Manager in Baltimore. About half of his words were the f-bomb and use on the work floor in front of other employees. What was done? Absolutely nothing. Potter is two faced when it comes to craft and front line supervisors using fould language, but does nothing about senior managers. That fool also kicks trash cans on the work floor ab=nd berates people in a loud voice in front of other employees. What a horses ass.

By: mngmnt suks dikz

mngmnt suks dikz — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 03:45:36 +0000

fuk q

By: Kevin

Kevin — Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:05:36 +0000

When it happened to clerk it grounds for removal but when it happened to Mgmt it is normal. We need to be consistent with the rule.

By: up yours

up yours — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:34:17 +0000

amen to that!

By: BW

BW — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:49:15 +0000

This is great could we get this court to rule on vulgarity from the mouths of management.