<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EEOC Proposes Broader Definition of Disability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postalreporternews.net/2009/10/17/eeoc-proposes-broader-definition-of-disability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2009/10/17/eeoc-proposes-broader-definition-of-disability/</link>
	<description>Postal News, Postal Articles and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2009/10/17/eeoc-proposes-broader-definition-of-disability/comment-page-1/#comment-6919</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalreporternews.com/?p=1074#comment-6919</guid>
		<description>William: I&#039;m on your side, but calling you a name doesn&#039;t violate Title VII in and of itself. What motivated your boss to call you a name is the issue. Was your boss motivated by any of the listed purviews? Race, color, gender, reprisal, religion, national origin, we all know them.

Don: You sound bitter. Many, many, people with some degree of disability can be, and are, very productive employees. Also, disability through OPM or OWCP is merely a percentage of their salary; and why pay people to stay home and do nothing when they are able to come to work and do something?

I realize that a limited duty person is a bit of a problem for a manager...but they have a right to work under law. I also know that managers have bonus monetary incentives to weed out disabled persons... at least in the USPS.

Open your heart a bit; what goes around comes around brother, and there but for the grace of God go you and I. Have compassion for the qualified handicapped individuals. I like the new proposals.

Believe me the EEOC is tighter than Dick&#039;s hat band right now. The judges have, perhaps unintentionally, de facto raised the burden of proof from preponderance to clear and convincing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William: I&#8217;m on your side, but calling you a name doesn&#8217;t violate Title VII in and of itself. What motivated your boss to call you a name is the issue. Was your boss motivated by any of the listed purviews? Race, color, gender, reprisal, religion, national origin, we all know them.</p>
<p>Don: You sound bitter. Many, many, people with some degree of disability can be, and are, very productive employees. Also, disability through OPM or OWCP is merely a percentage of their salary; and why pay people to stay home and do nothing when they are able to come to work and do something?</p>
<p>I realize that a limited duty person is a bit of a problem for a manager&#8230;but they have a right to work under law. I also know that managers have bonus monetary incentives to weed out disabled persons&#8230; at least in the USPS.</p>
<p>Open your heart a bit; what goes around comes around brother, and there but for the grace of God go you and I. Have compassion for the qualified handicapped individuals. I like the new proposals.</p>
<p>Believe me the EEOC is tighter than Dick&#8217;s hat band right now. The judges have, perhaps unintentionally, de facto raised the burden of proof from preponderance to clear and convincing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2009/10/17/eeoc-proposes-broader-definition-of-disability/comment-page-1/#comment-6916</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalreporternews.com/?p=1074#comment-6916</guid>
		<description>Just what is needed, more disabled people in the work force. Can&#039;t do the job? Go home and apply for disability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what is needed, more disabled people in the work force. Can&#8217;t do the job? Go home and apply for disability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william perkins</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2009/10/17/eeoc-proposes-broader-definition-of-disability/comment-page-1/#comment-6918</link>
		<dc:creator>william perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalreporternews.com/?p=1074#comment-6918</guid>
		<description>EEOC, what a joke.  our previous postmaster, dilma lavelle calls me a &quot;two faced bastard&quot; to my face in front of a supervisor and another clerk and nothing happens to her.
no justice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EEOC, what a joke.  our previous postmaster, dilma lavelle calls me a &#8220;two faced bastard&#8221; to my face in front of a supervisor and another clerk and nothing happens to her.<br />
no justice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william perkins</title>
		<link>http://www.postalreporternews.net/2009/10/17/eeoc-proposes-broader-definition-of-disability/comment-page-1/#comment-6917</link>
		<dc:creator>william perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postalreporternews.com/?p=1074#comment-6917</guid>
		<description>EEOC, what a joke.  our previous postmaster, dilma laveelle calls me a &quot;two faced bastard&quot; to my face infront of a supervisor and another clerk and nothing happens to her.
no justice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EEOC, what a joke.  our previous postmaster, dilma laveelle calls me a &#8220;two faced bastard&#8221; to my face infront of a supervisor and another clerk and nothing happens to her.<br />
no justice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

